If we say that universe is infinite..and in such a universe an average sized star called sun has few planets under its gravity...what we call solar system..has an ideal distance with one of the planet called Earth to constitute the evolution of life in it, then..is it not a high probability, a random event? Ever since the pure science has developed as a stream of subject, a body of knowledge, scientists have assumed the probability of other planets with similar stage of life in them. Considering the infinite size of universe and infinite number of stars it can not be ruled out. But only one assurance it is not known yet..! The evolution of life on earth is a perfect phenomena! At least I call so. What if the distance between Sun & Earth is few hundred thousand kilometers more or less than 92 million miles..? But it..just is not..! ..It is a perfect distance..! If a random event like this, is a perfect condition for another event like development of life..then, why we call this world as imperfect..? So perfection, naturally can also be a random event and need not a rational one..! The change of seasons, rain, sunshine, breeze, oceans, snowpeaks, mountains, rivers are the results of a perfect phenomena, each caused by one another.
If life has began with unicellular organisms and developed into various stages of evolution, mankind is now known last stage in the chain! ..So what is next..? (We do not yet have a completely convincing theory on evolution of the first unicellular being..!)
So development as an effect has the cause of a perfect condition preceding it.!. If mankind has to develop to any thing called a next stage..is it a perfect condition? I say it is not. A perfect condition is made imperfect with rationality of mankind. The environmental effect. Then imperfection can not cause a development, instead a development in the negative side..!? ..
..Now tell me ..has this arguement seen a logical sequence..!? If yes.. then ..existence is due to the perfection..extinction is due to the imperfection.. ! Perfection and imperfection can both be natural or rational..But the impacts are different..isn't it..?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment